Canucks for 9/11 Truth

Hang Three

2006-07-22T21:50:00.000-07:00

Hang Three

Problem:
Nobody in the world trusts the US government. South America is so paranoid of the US that they will go their own way and not let any north-south "progress through free trade" deal happen. They are turning against the USA more every day and when Mexico falls to a leftist who will join the southern Chavez coalition there will be big disruption in the plans of the power elite.

The Arab world in particular and the Islamic world in general now view the USA as the main enemy to defeat to preserve their culture and religion.

More than half the population of the USA itself is now of the opinion that their own government had something to do with the deaths of thousands of their own citizens on September 11th, 2001.

There are now very prominent people confronting the election fraud techniques that have been the only way for the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld troika to attain and maintain power. Without it there will be a change in government. If it is tried again it may result in wholesale unrest and further disruption of the power elite's agenda.

Solution:
Let the three responsible for this sad state of affairs hang. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld got themselves into this and have dragged down the rest of the power elite agenda with them so cut the losses.

First the fall elections in 2006 for the congress will be won by the Democrats fairly so let them go ahead and win a majority in both houses. They will then start impeachment proceedings on BCR. They will also demand a new and comprehensive look into the events of September 11th, 2001. A joint inquiry will find out that it was an inside job with BCR knowing the details.

Tried for treason and mass murder would be the next step. Once convicted they would be executed.

Almost all the others involved would be let go because they didn't know people would be in the buildings when they were demolished and other reasoning along those lines. They were just following orders and were then too scared to do anything. A few others like Larry Silverstein and Rudy Giuliani may have to be sacrificed as well but the number can be kept very low. Less than a dozen. This would leave most of the people needed by the power elite in positions of power where they could be of use.

Results:
So what would all this achieve? Lots!

First the whole world would be in awe of the USA once again. Able to take out the three most powerful people on the planet and do it without firing a shot? What a country.

Second the world would trust the new president. He would be a Democrat but still under the control of the power elite. His image in the world would more positive than even JFK's at his height of popularity. They would listen to whatever he said and debate it rather than just ignoring him like they do now. His pitch would have to be different than the previous administration's but the end goals would be the same. Most importantly they would listen. South America would open up to him and consider him a great revolutionary leading the fight against the evil that the USA was seen to be.

Third the distraction value would be immense. Think about years of television and all other media coverage of the impeachment and trials. A lot of the power elite's agenda could get put through without notice all over the world. With the joint inquiry going into great detail all the 9/11 "conspiracy theorists" would be busy making sure it was done right and they will be too busy congratulating themselves to notice the rest of the plan slipping by.

Fourth the Arab world could be talked into uniting into a "United States of Arabia" with a single currency controlled by power elite in the same way they control the Euro and the Dollar now. This would be much better than trying to get one country at a time. Get them all on the hook at once.

Fifth it would send a clear message to future "leaders" that if you have grand plans and screw up then you are expendable. This would make them less impatient and lazy which are the exact qualities that have lead to this current debacle.

Conclusion:
Thousands were sacrificed so what is another three? Nothing really. For the greater good they can take one for the team.

Addresses for all 308 Canadian Members of Parliament

2006-06-09T21:37:00.000-07:00

As of 08 June, 2006
Email Addresses for all 308 Canadian Members of Parliament

Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca
Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca
Albrecht.H@parl.gc.ca
Alghabra.O@parl.gc.ca
Allen.M@parl.gc.ca
Allison.D@parl.gc.ca
Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca
Anders.R@parl.gc.ca
Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca
Andre.G@parl.gc.ca
Angus.C@parl.gc.ca
Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca
Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca
Atamanenko.A@parl.gc.ca
Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca
Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca
Bains.N@parl.gc.ca
Baird.J@parl.gc.ca
Barbot.V@parl.gc.ca
Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca
Batters.D@parl.gc.ca
Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca
Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca
Bell.C@parl.gc.ca
Bell.D@parl.gc.ca
Bellavance.A@parl.gc.ca
Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca
Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca
Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca
Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca
Bevington.D@parl.gc.ca
Bezan.J@parl.gc.ca
Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca
Black.D@parl.gc.ca
Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca
Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca
Blais.R@parl.gc.ca
Blaney.S@parl.gc.ca
Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca
Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca
Boshcoff.K@parl.gc.ca
Bouchard.R@parl.gc.ca
Boucher.S@parl.gc.ca
Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca
Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca
Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Brown.B@parl.gc.ca
Brown.G@parl.gc.ca
Brown.P@parl.gc.ca
Bruinooge.R@parl.gc.ca
Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca
Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
Calkins.B@parl.gc.ca
Cannan.R@parl.gc.ca
Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca
Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca
Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca
Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca
Carrier.R@parl.gc.ca
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca
Casson.R@parl.gc.ca
Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca
Chan.R@parl.gc.ca
Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca
Chong.M@parl.gc.ca
Chow.O@parl.gc.ca
Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca
Clement.T@parl.gc.ca
Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca
Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca
Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca
Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca
Crete.P@parl.gc.ca
Crowder.J@parl.gc.ca
Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca
Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca
Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca
Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca
Damours.J@parl.gc.ca
Davidson.P@parl.gc.ca
Davies.L@parl.gc.ca
Day.S@parl.gc.ca
DeBellefeuille.C@parl.gc.ca
DelMastro.D@parl.gc.ca
Demers.N@parl.gc.ca
Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca
Devolin.B@parl.gc.ca
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca
Dhaliwal.S@parl.gc.ca
Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca
Dion.S@parl.gc.ca
Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca
Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca
Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca
Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca
Epp.K@parl.gc.ca
Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca
Faille.M@parl.gc.ca
Fast.E@parl.gc.ca
Finley.D@parl.gc.ca
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca
Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca
Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca
Folco.R@parl.gc.ca
Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca
Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca
Fry.H@parl.gc.ca
Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca
Galipeau.R@parl.gc.ca
Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca
Gaudet.Ro@parl.gc.ca
Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca
Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca
Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca
Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca
Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca
Goodyear.G@parl.gc.ca
Gourde.J@parl.gc.ca
Graham.B@parl.gc.ca
Grewal.N@parl.gc.ca
Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca
Guay.M@parl.gc.ca
Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca
guimom1@parl.gc.ca
Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Harris.R@parl.gc.ca
Harvey.L@parl.gc.ca
Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca
Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca
Hiebert.R@parl.gc.ca
Hill.J@parl.gc.ca
Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca
Holland.M@parl.gc.ca
Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca
Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca
Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca
Jean.B@parl.gc.ca
Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca
Julian.P@parl.gc.ca
Kadis.S@parl.gc.ca
Kamp.R@parl.gc.ca
Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca
Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca
Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca
Keeper.T@parl.gc.ca
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca
Khan.W@parl.gc.ca
Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca
Kotto.M@parl.gc.ca
Kramp.D@parl.gc.ca
Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca
Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca
Lake.M@parl.gc.ca
Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca
Lapierre.J@parl.gc.ca
Lauzon.G@parl.gc.ca
Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca
Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca
Lee.D@parl.gc.ca
Lemay.M@parl.gc.ca
Lemieux.P@parl.gc.ca
Lessard.Y@parl.gc.ca
Levesque.Y@parl.gc.ca
Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca
Lukiwski.T@parl.gc.ca
Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca
Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca
Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca
macaul1@parl.gc.ca
Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca
Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca
Malo.L@parl.gc.ca
Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca
Manning.F@parl.gc.ca
Mark.I@parl.gc.ca
Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca
Marston.W@parl.gc.ca
Martin.K@parl.gc.ca
Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca
Martin.P@parl.gc.ca
Martin.T@parl.gc.ca
Masse.B@parl.gc.ca
Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
Mayes.C@parl.gc.ca
McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca
McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca
McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca
McKay.J@parl.gc.ca
McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca
Menard.R@parl.gc.ca
Menard.S@parl.gc.ca
Menzies.T@parl.gc.ca
Merasty.G@parl.gc.ca
Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca
Miller.L@parl.gc.ca
Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca
Mills.B@parl.gc.ca
Minna.M@parl.gc.ca
Moore.J@parl.gc.ca
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca
Mourani.Ma@parl.gc.ca
Murphy.B@parl.gc.ca
Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca
Nadeau.R@parl.gc.ca
Nash.P@parl.gc.ca
Neville.A@parl.gc.ca
Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca
Norlock.R@parl.gc.ca
OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca
Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca
Ouellet.C@parl.gc.ca
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca
Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca
Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca
Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca
Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca
Patry.B@parl.gc.ca
Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca
Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca
Petit.D@parl.gc.ca
Picard.P@parl.gc.ca
Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca
Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca
Preston.J@parl.gc.ca
Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca
Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca
Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca
Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca
Redman.K@parl.gc.ca
Regan.G@parl.gc.ca
Reid.S@parl.gc.ca
Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca
Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca
Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca
Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca
Rota.A@parl.gc.ca
Roy.J@parl.gc.ca
Russell.T@parl.gc.ca
Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca
Savage.M@parl.gc.ca
Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca
Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca
Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca
Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca
Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca
Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca
Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca
Silva.M@parl.gc.ca
Simard.R@parl.gc.ca
Simms.S@parl.gc.ca
Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca
Smith.J@parl.gc.ca
Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca
Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca
St-Cyr.T@parl.gc.ca
St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca
St.Amand.L@parl.gc.ca
St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca
Stanton.B@parl.gc.ca
Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca
Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca
Storseth.B@parl.gc.ca
Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca
Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca
Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca
Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca
Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca
Temelkovski.L@parl.gc.ca
Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca
Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca
Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca
Tilson.D@parl.gc.ca
Toews.V@parl.gc.ca
Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca
Trost.B@parl.gc.ca
Turner.G@parl.gc.ca
Tweed.M@parl.gc.ca
Valley.R@parl.gc.ca
VanKesteren.D@parl.gc.ca
VanLoan.P@parl.gc.ca
Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca
Verner.J@parl.gc.ca
Vincent.R@parl.gc.ca
Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca
Wallace.M@parl.gc.ca
Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca
Warawa.M@parl.gc.ca
Warkentin.C@parl.gc.ca
Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca
Watson.J@parl.gc.ca
Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca
Williams.J@parl.gc.ca
Wilson.B@parl.gc.ca
Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca
Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca
Zed.P@parl.gc.ca

Depleted Uranium

2006-06-08T20:58:00.000-07:00

Well they didn't find any WMD but they sure used a lot. That is 4 times now that the US has used WMD that will end up killing hundreds of thousands to millions of people.

http://www.umrc.net/riordon.aspx

This is how the Canadian government treats its loyal soldiers! Please support the folks at the Uranium Medical Research Center. They are doing great work on a shoestring budget.

The particles of depleted uranium are lighter than dust so they stay in the air longer and travel farther. So depending on which way the wind blows hundreds of thousands to millions of asians, indians and turks are going to die!

Veterans for 9/11 Truth

2006-05-12T19:09:00.000-07:00

Just came across the site www.v911t.org which is the site of the Veterans for 9/11 Truth. They are encouraging everyone to fly the flag upside down as a distress signal. This is completely in accordance with the laws on flying the flag:

United States Code, Title 4, Chapter 1. The Flag.
Section 8. Respect for flag. [ ] "a. The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property."

As they say on their website "A nation in dire distress".

This is the best idea I've seen in a long time because it is a way for everyone to let the media and government know that they can't stop people. The media may not show it but when there are thousands of flags flying upside down in every city then there is no denying that the people know what the score is.

Replies to emails

2006-04-11T19:23:00.000-07:00

Since sending the emails I've received several polite replies that you expect from MPs. I also sent the email to lots of the political parties that don't have seats in the parliment.

So far the most interesting reply was this one from a fellow Libertarian of all things (hard to believe but yes even Libertarians get stuck in DENIAL).

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Apr 11, 2006 6:05 AM
Subject: RE: 9-11 What can we do?
To: Timothy McMurphy
Cc:

Hi:
My engineering degree is in electronics and not mechanical or civil, but clearly this was full of holes in inaccuracies from the first few paragraphs. I know when I first saw the TV coverage I was thinking this looks like a planned demolition as did many engineers.

Due to the surprising way the buildings collapsed and the broad implications for building design
there were several independent studies done by various engineering and architectural groups in various countries. They all concluded that the airplanes would have caused the damage as observed once cause and effect were investigated by people who understand how a building is designed and how materials react to fires.

I note that none of these studies is referenced and apparently none were read, and of course nobody on the list or referenced has even rudimentary engineering or architectural credentials.

The closest to one of the serious investigators they list was the Nova TV story, the author would have done well to have read some of even this consumer level information contained there, for instance:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse2.html
Please there are enough real problems conspiracies of government out there, no need to invent more.

---------------------------------------------------------
My Reply
-------------------
So buildings can collapse at near freefall speeds onto their own footprint even when not hit by a plane (WTC7)? Interesting.

You say there were "several independent studies done by various engineering and architectural groups in various countries". Can you point me in their direction? I would love to read them. I always keep an open mind on these things.

The Nova documentary was a joke because it didn't take into account the 47 core columns in WTC1 and WTC2 (it didn't even try to explain WTC7). The FEMA investigation also had to ignore the 47 core columns to make their scenario work.

You say "and of course nobody on the list or referenced has even rudimentary engineering or architectural credentials". I'm sure Judy Wood (PHD in Mechanical Engineering and professor of it at Clemson University), Steven Jones (PHD in Physics and professor of same at
Brigham Young University) would love to hear that they are not qualified in your view.

You are entitled to your opinion and I won't bother you again on this subject. It is obvious from your reply that your mind is made up and you haven't bothered to read anything serious on the st911.org website (like the technical paper by Prof. Jones).

If you could please send me any URLs or other information that supports the official position I would love to read it and I'm sure others at st911.org would love to analyze it as well.

Ironic that there are more open minds in the Conservative and Liberal ranks than there is in the Libertarian party. As a long time Libertarian myself I find that very amusing.

---------------------------------
See the comments for followup.

Canadian Senate Email

2006-04-11T19:21:00.000-07:00

Here is the email I sent to the senators:

What do all the following people have in common?

- Steven E Jones, professor of Physics at BYU.
- Clemson engineering professor Judy Wood.
- US air force colonel, Bob Bowman, who was head of the US Air Force space defense under presidents Ford and Carter.
- David Ray Griffin theologian, professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology.
- CIA analyst Ray McGovern, expert on National Security who's career spans JFK to GHW Bush.
- Former U.S. congressman Dan Hamburg.
- A Republican, Paul Craig Roberts assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Ronald Reagan.
- Morgan Reynolds professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and chief economist for the US Department of Labor during Bush's first term.

They all believe that 9-11 was an inside job perpetrated by parts of the US government.

Hard to believe? Yes it is. Look at the list real hard. These are NOT conspiracy theory nuts. They are not actors with opinions.

If you go to www.st911.org (Scholars for 9/11 Truth) and read the technical articles by professor Jones

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

or the one by professor Wood

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html

you come to the quick realization that they are serious!

Please read what these people have to say. It is very important.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what does that have to do with us Canadians?

In view of the facts that:

1) 24 Canadians died (or are missing) due to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks

2) We went to war in Afghanistan with our American and NATO allies on the basis of those same attacks

3) We continue to sustain losses of our forces in Afghanistan

We feel that we are entitled to have all the facts about the incidents of September 11th, 2001.

In pursuit of the facts we would hereby request that the Canadian Senate make a "formal public request" to the government of the United States of America to do the following:

1. Immediate release of the full Pentagon surveillance tapes, of which five frames (only) have been released via the official ASCE report, as Judicial Watch has also requested. We further demand release of the video tape seized by FBI agents minutes after the Pentagon hit, from the fuel service station near the Pentagon, as well as any other videotape which shows the 9/11 strike on the Pentagon.

2. Immediate release of 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage held by NIST, largely from private photographers, regarding the collapses of WTC buildings on 9/11/2001 (NIST, 2005, p. 81). In particular, all footage relating to the collapse of WTC 7 (including shots before, during and after the collapse) must be released immediately, without waiting for the NIST report on WTC 7, which is long overdue and may be prolonged indefinitely.

3. Audio tapes of interviews with air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 were intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building. We demand an explanation for this destruction of evidence and ask that the possible existence of other copies of such tapes or perhaps of written transcripts of the interviews be pursued. All air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 should be allowed to testify during a public forum under oath.

If we as loyal members of NATO have been duped into participating in a war for which the basis was staged attacks then the government of Canada owes it to the people of the country to either withdraw our troops from that war or seek a mandate to continue based upon new developments.

If the attacks happened as claimed by the government of the United States of America then having all the available evidence made public can not harm anyone and would bolster the continued support of our role in Afghanistan.

Thank you for your time

Request to Members of Parliment

2006-04-03T20:33:00.000-07:00

Here is an email that I sent to all the Canadian Members of Parliment. Out of 308 emails only 4 bounced (I got the addresses from the government's own web site).

The list of email addresses is in the first comment. I highly recommend that all Canadian Citizens send a polite request to their MP or to all the MPs in our federal parliment. You may word your document any way you like or use this one as a template.

I am not anti-american nor do I think we should be rude, even to those that perpetrated this crime. The simple fact is that there are too many unanswered questions about 9/11 to ignore.

1) How do buildings collapse onto their own footprint at near freefall speeds without it being a professional demolition job?

2) Why does the government of the USA not release the more than 10,000 video and still photo shots from 9/11 that it has?

3) Why is there molten metal pouring out the side of one of the towers. Captured on video that is still available to be viewed and analyzed.

For serious discussion of these and other issues I highly recommend that everyone go to www.st911.org and read the technical papers by Jones, Wood, et al.

Once you have read them I hope you will sign the petition on that site and take other actions like emailing, phoning or faxing your member of parliment.

Thank you for your time

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear members of parliament;

I am writing you about a matter I would like you to seriously consider.

In view of the facts that:

1) 24 Canadians died (or are missing) due to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks that occurred on that day

2) We went to war in Afghanistan with our American and NATO allies on the basis of those same attacks

3) We continue to sustain losses of our forces in Afghanistan

We feel that we are entitled to have all the facts about the incidents of September 11th, 2001.

In pursuit of the facts we would hereby request that the Canadian government make a formal public request to the government of the United States of America to do the following:

1. Immediate release of the full Pentagon surveillance tapes, of which five frames (only) have been released via the official ASCE report, as Judicial Watch has also requested. We further demand release of the video tape seized by FBI agents minutes after the Pentagon hit, from the fuel service station near the Pentagon, as well as any other videotape which shows the 9/11 strike on the Pentagon.

2. Immediate release of 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage held by NIST, largely from private photographers, regarding the collapses of WTC buildings on 9/11/2001 (NIST, 2005, p. 81). In particular, all footage relating to the collapse of WTC 7 (including shots before, during and after the collapse) must be released immediately, without waiting for the NIST report on WTC 7, which is long overdue and may be prolonged indefinitely.

3. Audio tapes of interviews with air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 were intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building. We demand an explanation for this destruction of evidence and ask that the possible existence of other copies of such tapes or perhaps of written transcripts of the interviews be pursued. All air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 should be allowed to testify during a public forum under oath.

If we have been duped into participating in a war for which the basis was staged attacks then the government of Canada owes it to the people of the country to either withdraw our troops from that war or seek a mandate to continue based upon new developments.

If the attacks happened as claimed by the government of the United States of America then having all the available evidence made public can not harm anyone and would bolster the continued support of our role in Afghanistan.

Thank you for your time

------------------------------------------------------------------------------